The economics of psychological trauma.
The Research Institute of Trauma Economy is a research institute in formation that studies the economic consequences of psychological trauma. We work from the published evidence and public data today, and we are building toward a public data trust for de-identified clinical outcomes.
Problem
Trauma's costs land in health care, employment, education and the justice system, and untreated trauma costs most where resources are scarcest.
The clinical data that could show what treatment does over time is held in proprietary systems, unused or used to manage claims, and mostly describes people who could afford care. Governed as a public good, it could show what works, for whom, and at what cost.
Research questions
- Q1What does psychological trauma cost the United States each year, and who pays?
- Q2Which adverse childhood experiences predict which adult economic outcomes, and how strongly?
- Q3How does untreated trauma shape a working life, from first job to exit?
- Q4What is the economic return to treating and preventing trauma, and who captures it?
- Q5Who carries the burden of trauma, and whose experience is missing from the clinical record?
- Q6Where is the money spent on trauma's consequences allocated, and how much of it reaches prevention and treatment?
- Q7Can a single Trauma Index track population trauma burden over time in a way policymakers can use?
Methods
-
Stage 1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature, with re-analysis of public survey data.
CDC BRFSS · NSDUH · MEPS · NLSY97 · PSID · Add Health
-
Stage 2
Linked government, health and insurance datasets under data use agreements, with university research partners.
-
Stage 3
Pooled de-identified clinical outcomes, donated by clinical software platforms, held in public trust and analyzed with statistical and machine-learning methods.
All clinical data is analyzed inside RITE's own secured environment. It is never sent to outside AI services and never used to decide anything about an individual.
Governance
RITE will hold donated clinical data as a public trust, overseen by a majority-independent board. These principles are fixed before any data arrives.
Donated, never sold
Data enters by donation and never leaves by sale or license.
De-identified before transfer
RITE accepts no identifiable data.
Independent findings
Data partners have no say over questions, methods or results.
Closed analytics
Analysis stays inside RITE's secured environment.
No individual decisions
Nothing RITE builds is used to judge a person's care, coverage or work.
Open methods
Protocols are registered, code is published, limitations are stated.
All ten data principles, and the terms of the founder's conflict of interest, are in the prospectus.
Status
- Phase
- 1 of 5, pre-seed
- Legal entity
- Nonprofit in formation; incorporation planned
- Advisors
- Not yet announced
- Data partners
- Seeking founding partners
- Prospectus
- Read the prospectus
- Publications
- Working papers and policy recommendations will be published here first.
People
Ian Noël, LMHC-D, NCC
FounderLicensed mental health counselor, certified trauma clinician and clinical supervisor in New York. His trauma-focused clinical work led him to ask what trauma costs. Ian is also the founder of intuitiveSuite, Inc., which makes intuitiveEMDR, clinical documentation software for trauma therapists. RITE's governance principles apply to that relationship.
Advisors
To be announced.Contact
Researchers, funders and prospective data partners